Farmland that could grow 250,000 tonnes of vegetables a year lost to development, research shows

Almost 14,500 hectares of the country’s best agricultural land has been lost to development since 2010 (pic Julie Davies)

•          Two million fewer people can be fed their five a day from vegetables homegrown in England as prime farmland lost to development

•          Food security concerns increase, with 60 per cent of England’s finest agricultural land at the highest risk of flooding from climate change

•          Almost 300,000 homes have been built on prime farmland – with an extra 1,400 hectares used for renewable-energy projects – despite more than enough previously developed brownfield land waiting for regeneration

England’s future food security has been called into question after losing farmland capable of feeding the combined populations of Liverpool, Sheffield and Manchester their five a day.

New research by CPRE, the countryside charity, found almost 14,500 hectares of the country’s best agricultural land, which could grow at least 250,000 tonnes of vegetables a year based on typical yields, has been permanently lost to development since 2010.

There was an exponential rise in Best and Most Versatile (BMV) agricultural land set aside for housing and industry between 2010 and 2022, from 60 hectares to more than 6,000 hectares per year.

Almost 300,000 homes were built on more than 8,000 hectares of prime farmland. This is despite there being space for 1.3 million homes to be built on more than 26,000 hectares of previously developed brownfield land, much of it disused and derelict urban patches of the midlands and north most in need of regeneration.

The increased risk of severe flooding caused by climate change will further challenge food security in future. More than 200,000 hectares – or 60 per cent – of England’s finest Grade 1 agricultural land is within areas at the highest risk of flooding, known as Flood Zone 3. Our most productive farmland is disproportionately close to river and coastal flood plains, with 75 per cent of BMV in the East Midlands and 95 per cent of BMV in the east of England at the highest risk of flooding.

That is why CPRE is calling on the government to introduce a comprehensive, cross-departmental land-use strategy. It must provide a planning framework to balance the competing and often conflicting demands for farming, housing and energy on a finite amount of land while also meeting legally binding net-zero targets. You can report the CPRE report Building on Food Security here.

The National Planning Policy Framework, which is due to be updated next year, should prioritise a ‘brownfield first’ approach to housebuilding, with a preference for medium- and higher-density units to help protect our most valuable agricultural land wherever possible. There should be a firm presumption against development on BMV land.

Crispin Truman, chief executive of CPRE, said: “For the first time in several generations, our food security is at risk – yet we’ve seen a 100-fold increase in the loss of our best farmland to development since 2010. Heating, eating and housing are fundamental needs. A healthy environment, mitigating and adapting against the devastation threatened by the climate emergency is the bedrock that underpins them all. We need to know what to put where. That’s why we need a land-use strategy.

“Maintaining agricultural land for domestic food production is critical. This must be achieved in the context of addressing and adapting to climate change, reversing the loss of nature and increasing demands on land for other purposes, not least housing and production of renewable energy.

“As we face a cost-of-living crisis, housing crisis and the adjustment of our farming sector to post-Brexit subsidies, we have multiple, critical priorities for our land. We need to move away from intensive farming practices and towards a more ‘multifunctional’ approach, reconciling food production with better management for natural and cultural heritage, and for public access. Policies which are put in place now will be crucial in the coming years to ensure the most efficient use of our land in the face of these challenges.”

CPRE’s report on the loss of agricultural land is believed to be the first ever to quantify the scale of development nationally on the two highest and most productive grades of farmland. The east of England has seen high levels of development on BMV land, with more than 3,200 hectares lost over the past 12 years. This is followed closely by the South East, with almost 3,000 hectares of BMV land disappearing overall and the greatest loss to development of Grade 1 land, which is rated excellent quality.

A further 1,400 hectares of BMV land was taken out of agricultural production for renewable-energy projects in the same period. CPRE estimates that this formerly productive farmland produces less than 3 per cent of the UK’s total installed solar capacity, or 0.3GW out of 14GW, suggesting it’s entirely possible for the government to balance food and energy security, particularly if rooftop solar and offshore wind are prioritised.

Climate change is likely to have severe consequences for our finest farmland and presents an increased threat to food security. Protecting our Best and Most Valuable agricultural land from permanent development now is vital if we are to maintain a secure food supply.

The Best and Most Versatile agricultural land grades:

•            Grade 1: excellent quality agricultural land – land with no or very minor limitations and yields are high and less variable. A very wide range of agricultural crops can be grown such as: apples and pears/salad crops/soft fruit-like berries/winter-harvested vegetables

•            Grade 2: very good quality agricultural land – land with minor limitations that affect crop yields, cultivations or harvesting. Generally high-yielding land but may be lower or more variable than Grade 1. 

•            Grade 3a: good quality agricultural land – land that can consistently produce moderate to high yields of a reduced variety of arable crops, such as: cereals/sugar beet/potatoes.

Methodology

Development on BMV land analysis: To understand the quantities of BMV land that have been built on since 2010, we used several spatial datasets from Natural England and a development dataset obtained from development consultancy Glenigan. The majority of information on the ALC Grade of soils throughout the country is based on the old system, which does not include Grades 3a and 3b and instead places both of these grades into an aggregated Grade 3. Using GIS tools and the post-1988 dataset, we were able to determine which developments in our dataset fell into Grade 3a land, and as a result could be considered BMV for our findings. It should be noted that the post-1988 dataset covers only 8 per cent of rural England and, as a result, we were only able to identify 3 per cent of the Grade 3 land that fell into Grade 3a or 3b.  

Appeals analysis: During April 2022, CPRE collated inspector reports from planning appeals platform Compass. A key-word search was conducted using the phrases ‘BMV’ and ‘Best and Most Versatile’ to identify the relevant appeals. 

Flooding risk analysis: To assess the risk faced by BMV to flooding, CPRE used the existing ‘provisional’ mapping dataset and the Environment Agency’s flood risk for planning, Flood Zone 3 datasets to understand where areas of BMV land were falling in relation to high flood risk areas. Using GIS tools, these two spatial datasets were overlaid and the intersect between Flood Zone 3 and Grade 1 areas was measured.

Solar energy production: There are currently 14GW (gigawatts) of solar power installed in the UK. Using Carbon Trust and Energy Saving Trust data, we estimate that 1GW of capacity supplies 8TWh (terawatt hours) of energy per year, so installed solar capacity is supplying about 112TWh. The 1,400 hectares of solar installations on BMV land should produce about 2.8TWh, which is 2.5 per cent of current installed solar capacity.

Wednesday, July 20, 2022

Crispin Truman to step down as CPRE chief executive in autumn

The announcement of Crispin Truman’s departure was made on Friday, July 15

It has been announced that Crispin Truman will be stepping down as CEO of CPRE, the countryside charity, at the end of September.

In his five years leading CPRE, Mr Truman has done much to change the charity’s position to become a positive voice for the countryside, extended its political network and overseen a series of campaign and media successes.

He has also put volunteering at the heart of the organisation and created new resources and services to support and strengthen the work of CPRE’s local groups.

Mr Truman said: “It has been a privilege to lead CPRE, the countryside charity.  

After five years, I have decided it is time to move on to pastures new. I joined CPRE because it brings together such a broad range of people with a shared passion for the countryside and local, public space. 

“I’ve enjoyed working with a fantastic team of highly skilled and committed staff and volunteers who have, together, renewed the charity’s positive purpose and achieved a transformation of the charity’s messaging.

“CPRE, the countryside charity, has become an attractive, solutions-focused campaign for people’s enjoyment of the countryside and the huge value that brings to well-being, climate, nature and landscape.

“I have lots of plans for what’s next, so please stay in touch and watch this space. I look forward to seeing CPRE go from strength to strength”.

Simon Murray, chair of CPRE’s board of trustees, said: “Crispin has been a tireless campaigner for CPRE and has championed the charity’s positive vision for the future of the countryside and rural communities and I thank him warmly.

“He has steered the organisation through a review of purpose, launched our six-year strategy and continued CPRE’s long tradition of successful campaigning for the countryside.”

CPRE trustees are putting in place arrangements for an interim chief executive while a permanent replacement is sought.

All at CPRE Kent would like to wish Mr Truman the best for the future.

Wednesday, July 20, 2022

Keep this fight going: the message is clear at LTC meeting at Shorne and Ashenbank

The walk drew campaigners from a range of groups (pic Woodland Trust/Thames Crossing Action Group)

“This is not a done deal – the Lower Thames Crossing is hanging by a thread.”

Becca from Transport Action Network had travelled from Hampshire to join a range of campaigners for last week’s Woodland Trust walk at Shorne Woods Country Park and Ashenbank Wood near Gravesend.

Both sites (they comprise part of the same SSSI) are threatened by the proposed crossing, and those present on a swelteringly hot day (Wednesday, July 13) gained a first-hand look at what could be in store should Highways England’s largest road scheme come to be built.

“This is the biggest carbon-emitting scheme in the whole roads programme – it would bust the country’s carbon-reduction target,” Becca told the group.

More specifically, the road would effectively destroy what was described as the last green space between Medway and London – itself a damning indictment of how over-developed north-west Kent has become.

It is, of course, always good to talk and Tim Bell, county council ranger at the country park, said the original plans for the crossing would have “pulverised” the site but five years of discussion had gone a long way towards saving much of it.

The worst-case scenario would still result in the loss of 30 metres of the park’s woodland from the boundary fence, but if placement of utilities could be tackled, that loss could be cut to six metres.

Of course, factors such as noise pollution, nitrogen deposition, micro-climate changes and impact on heritage can’t be ignored however much the road, should it be built, carves into the wood. (It was pointed out that HE was only evaluating noise pollution 300 metres into the site… as if it stops at 301 metres!).

With the A2 chopping a thunderous wall of noise and fumes between the country park and Ashenbank, it would be disingenuous to suggest such matters aren’t already evident, but it was perhaps surprising how much the noise faded once we were deeper inside the woods.   

Happily, it made it easier to listen and learn about a place so rich in natural, historical and archaeological interest. We heard about dormice mitigation areas, the brown long-eared bats using an air-raid shelter as a winter roost, the Bronze Age barrow (a Scheduled Ancient Monument) at Ashenbank, the £1 million funding for tree surveys, the fact that any veteran trees existed here at all was near-miraculous given the demands of, for example, the war effort and the nearby cement industry… and very much more.

Sometimes the source of the threats came as a surprise – for example the diversion of National Cycle Route 177 through Ashenbank would necessitate the path on which we were walking being resurfaced and potentially widened – an intrusive and damaging process that the trust wanted assessed by Highways England itself… if only the agency’s officials would come and look for themselves.

We learnt that veteran trees don’t have legal protection (the trust is working on this) and that, even though the whole site is subject to a Tree Preservation Order, that won’t be enough to save them from a project such as the LTC.

Hot tip: you need to find a rare bug or insect on your veteran tree to increase its chances of protection.

The Lower Thames Crossing is a huge scheme – its costing of £8.2 billion eats up more than half Highways England’s capital enhancement budget of £14.7 billion – but its poor functional case and the environmental damage it would inflict on both Kent and Essex means the respective CPRE branches, together with so many other groups, oppose it.

The team at Shorne Woods Country Park have already won some handsome concessions in the planning process, but, as others pointed out on Wednesday, HE needs to keep the county council onside. Other organisations and campaigners might not find it so easy.

We’ll leave the final word to ranger Tim Bell: “Be assertive – you need detailed answers.” Or, in other words, don’t take no for an answer!

  • For more on the Lower Thames Crossing, see here

Monday, July 18, 2022

Join Old Bunyard for a Kentish photographic fest

Images are organised in a clockwise tour of the county in 12 stages.

It’s billed as a photographic journey around England’s oldest county – and we’re sure you’ll love Old Bunyard’s Tour of Kent, a selection of more than 1,000 images taken in our home acres.

They were “extracted from the many more the author took while compiling Old Bunyard’s Kent Pride”, itself presented as a Kentish compendium put together from March 2020 to provide morale-boosting distraction during lockdown.

Click here to enjoy a job well done!

Monday, July 11, 2022

We’re looking for people to join us as assistant planning volunteers… can you help?

CPRE Kent is expanding the team

Do you want to help protect the Kent countryside from ever-increasing development pressure?

CPRE Kent, the countryside charity, is strengthening its efforts to keep the county beautiful and expanding its team across the county. It is looking to take on assistant planning volunteers to help act as our eyes and ears across Kent and Medway.

Dr Hilary Newport, CPRE Kent director, said: “The rural environment of Kent is under siege as never before. We campaign hard for both the protection of our countryside and the appropriate levels and types of housing that local people need.

“At the moment, sadly, we are seeing eye-watering levels of housing that respect neither our countryside nor our residents, many of whom are still finding it impossible to get a foot on the housing ladder.

“Anyone in the county who would like to join us in our fight for all that is good about the Kent countryside is very welcome to get in touch.”

If you are interested in any of the above roles or simply in the work of CPRE Kent, you can email info@cprekent.org.uk, phone 01233 714540 or visit the website www.cprekent.org.uk/about us. You can also find the charity on Facebook and Twitter.

Monday, June 20, 2022

Think you know the Isle of Oxney? Walks booklet reveals hidden treasures of this special place

Although 30 years old, Oxney Walks hosts a wealth of ideas and information

It’s a lesser-known delight of Kent, but the Isle of Oxney comprises one of the county’s most unspoilt stretches of countryside – and a locally-produced booklet shows us how to make the best of it with a series of walks.

The isle sits between Tenterden and Rye just over the county border in East Sussex and is an area of high ground rising from flat, marshy surrounds that are in effect a western extension of Romney Marsh.

It reaches five miles from east to west and two and a half miles north to south, with two parishes – Wittersham and Stone-cum-Ebony – included within it.

Once surrounded by the sea, which has receded and is now held back by sea walls, Oxney is still an island encircled by waterways, even if some of them are just a few metres wide.

Happily, it is possible to walk alongside many of these waterways, while a range of circular walks can be started from one of Wittersham, Stone or Ebony churches, heading out to and along a waterway and returning via another course.

The booklet offers 14 routes – the shortest is just two miles, while if you choose the combined Three Churches Walk be prepared to take on some 13 miles.

It was put together 30 years ago, so it’s worth bearing mind that some aspects might have changed in that time, but the application of a little common sense should be all that’s needed to enjoy a lovely day out in a delightful part of the county.  

  • Oxney Walks is available to buy at Wittersham Village Store in Poplar Road. Proceeds go to the Isle of Oxney.

Monday, July 11, 2020

Cleve Hill solar: CPRE Kent calls on Swale council to resist developer’s bid to push boundaries of agreement

The Swale landscape set for ruination by the planned solar farm

CPRE Kent is deeply concerned by the latest developments at Cleve Hill, the site set to host the country’s largest solar farm.

We have a standing objection to this application and have been vocal in our opposition to the scheme. We are therefore disappointed and alarmed to see the applicant is continuing to push the boundaries and expand upon what was previously agreed.

It should be being made clear to the public that this is not simply a request from the applicant for Swale Borough Council to sign off previously-agreed details. Rather, the applicant is seeking to vary and change what had been previously agreed. This is not being made clear within the submission.

These changes include:

•          The developer is now proposing to use larger solar PV modules. 

•          It is proposing use of ‘half tables’, which face now may face east or west.

•          The diversion of UKPN’s existing 11kV overhead-line will be now overhead for 65 metres when this was originally to be underground.

•          The top height of the flood protection bund has been increased by 300 mm to a height of 5.616 m

•          The total area of the electrical compound, including the whole of the flood protection bund, is proposed to extend to a total of 11.4 ha whereas the approval allows for 10 ha only

•          There are to be new access tracks to each of the transformer stations from the spine road. This results in new area of stone road amounting to 13,950 sq m of additional material to construct this additional trackway.

•          There are also more minor proposed changes, such as the number of pyranometers are to be increased from 15 to 50

Proposed changes such as the use of larger modules, change in orientation of tables, new overhead power lines and increased bund heights will all alter the landscape impact from that approved.

Increased roadways have an inevitable impact upon on-site biodiversity and drainage, along with the wider environmental impact associated with the additional construction materials.    

CPRE Kent reminds the council that the requirement under Regulation 19 of the DCO only allows it to give its approval to changes considered to be immaterial changes.

This includes the requirement that any changes may not give rise to any materially new or materially different environmental effects. While some of these changes might be viewed as incremental and therefore immaterial in isolation, quite clearly the in-combination changes amount to a material change.

Even if the council does view some of the proposed changes as incremental and therefore immaterial in isolation, it is our view the in-combination changes amount to a material change from the authorised development as approved.

We would therefore call on the council to resist this mission creep and reject outright this request to vary the approved development. 

  • To read more on Cleve Hill, click here

Thursday, July 11, 2022

We’re at the county show! Stop by and say hallo…

CPRE Kent, the countryside charity, will be at the Kent County Show this weekend in the woodland area.

We will have exciting activities for the children, from making wildflower seed bombs to working out which seed belongs to which flower. We will also have bug hotels, toad homes, hedgehog houses and very much more for sale, along with a second-hand book stall.

The show runs from Friday to Sunday, July 8-10. Hope to see you there!

Thursday, July 7, 2022

How planning by appeal cost Thanet one of its few remaining woodlands

A poor photograph but the damage to this piece of woodland is all too evident

This admittedly awful photograph shows what remains of one of Thanet’s last snippets of woodland.

With just 4.4 per cent tree canopy cover on the isle, Thanet is one of the least wooded districts in England – this was perhaps a contributory factor in the district council’s decision in August 2015 to refuse plans for 153 houses at Grade II-listed Westwood Lodge.

In explaining its decision, the council said: “The proposed development would result in a significant incursion of the built form into the Green Wedge, which would reduce the separation between settlements and result in a substantial loss of openness and established woodland habitat.”   

In these days of ‘planning by appeal’, however, Westwood Cross Developments did indeed appeal the council’s decision and in February 2017 the Planning Inspectorate duly approved the Broadstairs scheme, which entailed the felling of 150 Category C sycamore trees.

The inspector said the council’s position was weakened by its lack of a five-year housing supply.

Turning to the Green Wedge – the council’s long-standing policy that aims to keep open countryside between the three main towns of Margate, Ramsgate and Broadstairs – the inspector said:

“Further loss of trees within the site, and the introduction of additional dwellings, would be partially visible. However, as the woodland visible along the northern and eastern site boundaries would be largely retained, its distinctive landscape qualities would not be prejudiced.”

The original developer Places For People Homes had pulled out of the scheme, but it was taken up by Rooksmead Residential working with L&G Modular Homes, which has been building the properties at an off-site factory before they’re moved to Thanet.

Property management company Love Living Homes subsequently launched the shared-ownership development, which includes two-, three- and four-bedroom properties.

The plans had included the planting of 450 trees, along with wildlife corridors, but it’s difficult to see how the natural environment has won out on this one.

Wednesday, June 29, 2022

LTC Local Refinement Consultation – simply not good enough from National Highways

Lower Thames Crossing: CPRE Kent believes there needs to be a further and final round of consultation

CPRE Kent has responded to the Lower Thames Crossing Local Refinement Consultation.

As with the previous National Highways consultation, our main takeaway has been yet further frustration with the lack of detail provided, as well as the piecemeal fashion in which it is being provided.

There remain gaping holes in the information being provided; the documentation is very hard to navigate; key bits of information are buried in other documents from previous rounds of consultation; and key questions remain unanswered. There are also extremely important surveys such as air pollution surveys still yet to be done.

This is simply not good enough.

Sleek presentations, online videos and glossy brochures are one thing; however, it is the substance of the consultation that matters. 

It is for these reasons we strongly believe there needs to be a further and final round of consultation which brings together and updates all elements of the evidence base. This should be undertaken as a full statutory and be presented in cohesive and transparent manner. 

While this will never overcome our in-principle objection to the LTC project, this is the minimum that must be done to allow the people of Kent to fully understand the environmental, social and economic impacts of the LTC scheme.

  • CPRE Kent’s detailed comments on the consultation can be found here
  • For more on the Lower Thames Crossing, see here

Wednesday, June 22, 2022

Let June Bloom… and marvel at nature’s magic

Who could argue against the beauty of a natural garden like this?

We’re into the second half of Let June Bloom, the campaign launched this year by CPRE Kent, the countryside charity, and the benefits of taking part are gloriously apparent as wildlife thrives around us.

Many wildflowers and insects are at their peak in June, with plants such as cowslip, evening primrose, meadow clary and wild foxglove all blooming during this month.

Insects hatching in June include large white, small white and small blue butterflies, while painted ladies, red admirals and peacocks can all lend a blaze of colour to our parks and gardens.

Vicky Ellis, of CPRE Kent, said: “We’re asking people to give wildlife the best possible chance by not cutting back the flowers on which so much of it – and ultimately all of us – depends.”

The above picture was taken in Broadstairs by a resident who has indeed let his lawn bloom in June – the spread of bird’s foot trefoil, white clover and red valerian, among others, is the delightful result. We’ll say it again – Let June Bloom!

  • For more on Let June Bloom, see here

Wednesday, June 22, 2022

Last call on LTC consultation: it ends today

The Lower Thames Crossing as it might look

Today’s the day!

The Local Refinement Consultation on the proposed Lower Thames Crossing concludes at 11.59pm tonight (Monday, June 20).

It is of course very much last call, and the matter is complex, so if you would like a helping hand you can see can Thames Crossing Action Group’s step-by-step guide to the National Highways consultation here

Every voice counts!

  • For more on the Lower Thames Crossing, see here

Monday, June 20, 2022

With less than a week to run on LTC consultation, here’s a step-by-step guide

The issues can be complex, so the Thames Crossing Action Group has produced a guide (pic TCAG)

Time is running short if you’re planning on taking part in what might be the final consultation on the proposed Lower Thames Crossing.

The Local Refinement Consultation set up by National Highways concludes at 11.59pm on Monday, June 20.

We highly recommend submitting your views as the more responses received by NH the better.

Our friends at the Thames Crossing Action Group say: “You can of course respond using the National Highways consultation response form, but please bear in mind that NH have designed the form to get the answers/feedback they want.

“If you do use it, please read the wording carefully!” 

TCAG suggests instead giving your views either via email or post, highlighting that “you don’t have to use the response form”.

The matter is of course complex and if you would like a helping hand you might be interested in TCAG’s step-by-step guide to the consultation. You can see that here

CPRE Kent believes there are many problems with the crossing proposals and it is disappointing that the NH consultation does not address any of them.

Those issues include:

1. The A2 is to be reduced to two lanes both London- and coastbound – four lanes already at full capacity during commuter hours.

2. The Lower Thames Crossing is the wrong solution at the wrong location. On completion – in 2030! – the misery of the Dartford crossing will continue. Will lorries prefer this shorter northerly route, saving them fuel costs? It is predicted that the LTC will only reduce the Dartford crossing traffic by some 4 per cent.

3. Congestion at Dartford should be addressed without further delay. It is caused by the ‘stopping’ of all traffic in order to escort large tankers and many European lorries through the obsolete tunnels. This is effectively a red traffic light on the M25 causing ‘domino accidents’. The LTC does not resolve this problem.

4. The decision to build LTC was based on the promise of private funding. It is now to be publicly funded at a cost of £8.2 billion and rising. The Queen Elizabeth Bridge cost £120 million in 1991 (Highways England, now National Highways, rejected a relatively small cost of installing ‘wind supports’ as those installed in most bridges). This would not equate to £8.2 billion, even with inflation.

5. The LTC is being planned as an all lanes running expressway – a smart motorway by another name. This means no hard shoulder and as yet no reliable danger-detection system.

  • You can order a consultation pack here (alternatively phone 0300 123 5000 or email info@lowerthamescrossing.co.uk)
  • The National Highways dedicated LTC web page is here
  • For more on the LTC, see here
  • To read CPRE Kent’s response to the spring 2020 LTC consultation, click here

Tuesday, June 14, 2022

Everything’s lovely in the gardens for long-awaited CPRE Kent outing to Canterbury

Members of the group listen to the fascinating story of the medieval-cum-Victorian wall

The weather was kind as the first CPRE Kent outing in far too long was enjoyed by some 25 people on Saturday (June 11). Vicky Ellis reports on a superb day out…

The venue for our trip was the wonderful Franciscan Gardens in Canterbury and once we had all had gathered in the gardens, Josh, our guide for the day, began his talk.

We were told about the old greenhouse with an ancient vine growing through it and which would be the site’s next project; the wall that was medieval at the bottom and Victorian on top but now needed serious care and attention due to the medieval part collapsing under the weight of the Victorian part; the various stones that had been found on site; and the beautiful cutting garden with its culinary delights.

We ambled through the gardens to the old chapel that had, in its time, been a schoolhouse, a private residence and a prison, with graffiti scratched into the wood panelling still visible today.

After the talk we wandered at will around the gardens admiring the rose wall and insects and enjoying the wildflowers in the meadow.

We then popped over the road to The Old Weavers restaurant, where Jon, the head chef, treated us to a wonderful lunch. We were seated upstairs in the amazing restaurant, which was like a time capsule, and we felt we had all been cast back to the bygone days of the early 1800s.

All in all, it was a very relaxing and enjoyable day in beautiful and historic surroundings. Who would have thought that just off Canterbury High Street lies a place of such tranquillity, beauty and peace?

Monday, June 13, 2022

Lower Thames Crossing: read CPRE Kent’s Gravesham committee response

How the the crossing, should it be built, might look in Kent

We reported here that what is likely to be the final consultation on the Lower Thames Crossing ends on Monday, June 20.

The Gravesham committee of CPRE Kent has been working on its response to the consultation and you can read that here – it might help you with your own.

Monday, June 6, 2022